20 Mar 2022 | Updated 23 Mar 2022 [events] [calendar]

Monero Research Lab meeting scheduled for 23 March 2022 1700 UTC

The next Monero Research Lab1 meeting is scheduled to take place on Wednesday, March 23rd 2022 at 17:00 UTC.

The meeting should take place on IRC-Libera/Matrix2 in the #monero-research-lab channels.

Agenda

Note that this meeting’s chairperson and agenda are yet to be confirmed.

This meeting’s chairperson will be UkoeHB17. To view the full discussion topic list and propose an agenda item, post a comment on Github in #67718.

Logs for the previous MRL meeting are available on Github19.


Update 22/3/22: added GH issue.

Update 22/3/23: added link to logs20.


  1. https://github.com/monero-project/research-lab ↩

  2. irc://irc.libera.chat/#monero-research-lab (IRC), https://matrix.to/#/#monero-research-lab:monero.social (Matrix) ↩

  3. https://github.com/monero-project/meta/issues/630 ↩

  4. https://github.com/monero-project/monero/pull/7819 ↩

  5. https://github.com/monero-project/research-lab/issues/70 ↩

  6. https://libera.monerologs.net/monero-research-lab/20211230 ↩

  7. https://github.com/monero-project/research-lab/issues/92 ↩

  8. https://gist.github.com/tevador/50160d160d24cfc6c52ae02eb3d17024 ↩

  9. https://github.com/monero-project/meta/issues/621#issuecomment-948953655 ↩

  10. https://github.com/monero-project/research-lab/issues/86 ↩

  11. https://repo.getmonero.org/monero-project/ccs-proposals/-/merge_requests/249#note_11480 ↩

  12. https://github.com/monero-project/research-lab/issues/88 ↩

  13. https://ccs.getmonero.org/proposals/Rucknium-OSPEAD-Fortifying-Monero-Against-Statistical-Attack.html ↩

  14. https://github.com/UkoeHB/Seraphis ↩

  15. https://eprint.iacr.org/2021/1173 ↩

  16. https://github.com/cypherstack/triptych-multisig/blob/main/main.pdf ↩

  17. https://github.com/UkoeHB ↩

  18. https://github.com/monero-project/meta/issues/677 ↩

  19. https://github.com/monero-project/meta/issues/672#issuecomment-1063189000 ↩

  20. https://github.com/monero-project/meta/issues/677#issuecomment-1076635637 ↩